{"id":268,"date":"2011-05-03T17:02:26","date_gmt":"2011-05-03T09:02:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ritawu.me\/blog\/?p=268"},"modified":"2016-04-26T01:15:25","modified_gmt":"2016-04-26T05:15:25","slug":"press-freedom-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/ritawu.me\/blog\/2011\/05\/press-freedom-2011\/","title":{"rendered":"Press Freedom 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u4eca\u65e5\u662f\u4e16\u754c\u65b0\u95fb\u81ea\u7531\u65e5\uff0cFreedom House<\/a>\u4e8e\u6628\u65e5\u53d1\u5e03Freedom of the Press 2011<\/a>\uff0c\u4e2d\u56fd\u6392\u540d\u4e0b\u964d\u4e09\u4f4d\uff0c\u4e0e\u8001\u631d\u3001\u7a81\u5c3c\u65af\u5e76\u5217\u6392\u5728184\/196\u4f4d\uff0c\u9700\u7ffb\u5899\u3002<\/p>\n

\u6ca1\u6765\u5f97\u53ca\u8be6\u7ec6\u6574\u7406\uff0c\u5148\u6458\u5f55\u62a5\u544a\u4e2d\u51e0\u5904\u63d0\u53ca\u4e2d\u56fd\u7684\u90e8\u5206\uff1a<\/p>\n

\u201cThe survey found that only 15 percent of the world\u2019s inhabitants live in countries with a Free press, while 42 percent have a Partly Free press and 43 percent live in Not Free environments. The population figures are significantly affected by two countries\u2014China, with a Not Free status, and India, with a Partly Free status\u2014that together account for over a third of the world\u2019s nearly seven billion people.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cDuring 2010, however, many of these positive pressures remained below the surface. Indeed, authoritarian efforts to place restrictions on the press, new media, and other instruments of expression gained mo-mentum in a number of strategically important countries, such as China, Iran, Russia, and Venezuela. These states were also notable for their attempts to restrict media freedom and influence the news agenda beyond their borders.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cControl over new means of news dissemination, particularly internet-based social media, has become a priority for authoritarian governments. <\/strong>As media delivery systems have expanded from traditional print formats and terrestrial broadcasting to satellite television, the internet, and mobile telephones, authoritarian governments have intensified efforts to exert control over the new means of communication as well as the news outlets that employ them. Blocking of satellite television transmissions was noted in Egypt and Iran, while the social-networking website Facebook was blocked briefly in Pakistan and remained unavailable in China, Syria, and Vietnam. Some democratic and semidemocratic states also moved to implement additional controls over the internet, including South Korea and Thailand, which increased censorship of online content.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cAsia includes two of the worst-rated countries in the world, Burma and North Korea, as well as China, Laos, and Vietnam, all of which feature extensive state and party control of the press. Conditions in the world\u2019s largest poor performer, China, remained highly repressive in 2010. Authorities increased censorship and Communist Party propaganda in both traditional and online media, with a focus on politically sensitive issues like the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to jailed democracy advocate Liu Xiaobo in October. Detailed party directives\u2014which can arrive daily at editors\u2019 desks\u2014also curbed coverage related to public health, environmental accidents, deaths in police custody, and foreign policy. Dozens of activists, dissidents, and journalists remained in jail for their writing at year\u2019s end, with minority-language journalists facing special persecution. Nevertheless, journalists and bloggers continued to test the limits of permissible expression by exposing official corruption, circulating underground political publications, and engaging in imaginative efforts to circumvent China\u2019s comprehensive internet filtering system, the so-called Great Firewall.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u53e6\u5916\uff0cReporters Without Borders\uff08RSF\uff09<\/a>\u53bb\u5e7410\u6708\u53d1\u5e03Press Freedom Index 2010<\/a>\uff0c\u4e2d\u56fd\u4e5f\u53ea\u6392\u5728171\/178\u4f4d\u3002<\/p>\n

\u76f8\u5173\u62a5\u544a\u8fd8\u6709Freedom on the Net<\/a>\u3002<\/p>\n

\u4e0b\u56fe\u4e3a\u4e24\u5bb6\u673a\u6784press freedom 2011\u5730\u56fe\u3002<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Freedom of the Press 2011\u9605\u8bfb\u5168\u6587<\/a>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[17,14],"class_list":["post-268","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-work","tag-17","tag-14"],"views":4085,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/ritawu.me\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/ritawu.me\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/ritawu.me\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ritawu.me\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ritawu.me\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=268"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/ritawu.me\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/ritawu.me\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=268"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ritawu.me\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=268"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/ritawu.me\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=268"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}